Answer :
Sure, let's solve the problem step-by-step.
1. Understanding the Problem:
- You have a total budget of [tex]$175.
- You plan to buy a pair of shoes that cost $[/tex]47.
- You also want to buy some shirts, and each shirt costs [tex]$18.
- You need to find an inequality that represents the situation where `s` is the number of shirts you can buy.
2. Cost Breakdown:
- The cost of the shoes is $[/tex]47.
- The cost of `s` shirts would be [tex]$18 times `s`, or $[/tex]18s.
3. Set Up the Inequality:
- You want the total spending to be within your budget. This means the cost of the shoes plus the cost of the shirts should not exceed [tex]$175.
- Therefore, the inequality can be set up as follows:
\[
18s + 47 \leq 175
\]
So, the correct inequality is: \(18s + 47 \leq 175\).
This inequality ensures that the total cost of the shoes and shirts stays within the $[/tex]175 budget.
1. Understanding the Problem:
- You have a total budget of [tex]$175.
- You plan to buy a pair of shoes that cost $[/tex]47.
- You also want to buy some shirts, and each shirt costs [tex]$18.
- You need to find an inequality that represents the situation where `s` is the number of shirts you can buy.
2. Cost Breakdown:
- The cost of the shoes is $[/tex]47.
- The cost of `s` shirts would be [tex]$18 times `s`, or $[/tex]18s.
3. Set Up the Inequality:
- You want the total spending to be within your budget. This means the cost of the shoes plus the cost of the shirts should not exceed [tex]$175.
- Therefore, the inequality can be set up as follows:
\[
18s + 47 \leq 175
\]
So, the correct inequality is: \(18s + 47 \leq 175\).
This inequality ensures that the total cost of the shoes and shirts stays within the $[/tex]175 budget.