Answer :
Changes to an incident timeline can occur due to new findings or updates. It's essential to use specific, objective descriptions and assess the relevance and currency of the information. The narrative perspective and sequence may also be adjusted to better convey the timeline of events.
The timeline of an incident can indeed change if new information has emerged or if a review of the events leads to a different interpretation of what occurred. When preparing a progress report or documenting an incident, it is crucial to review all project-related or incident-related events. This involves a thorough analysis using past-tense descriptions for completed actions, a time-stamped record of discoveries, and an assessment of any new evidence that may have surfaced or updates made to the information. Moreover, the perspective from which the events are narrated can shift, emphasizing the ongoing versus completed nature of events, or their repeated occurrence.
Timelines can be restructured for a variety of reasons, such as to introduce a narrative sequence that does not follow chronological order or to highlight updates. Checking the document's date of update or publication can indicate whether there have been recent changes. A clear, objective description of what happened, including the time-specific actions taken and the general nature of the incident, is necessary. It is also crucial to evaluate if the information is still relevant, if it fills any knowledge gaps and to ascertain how often information changes on the specific topic being documented.
