Suppose you were interested in mapping classical sociological theories and modern sociological theories onto the different ways of theorizing the individual-society relationship proposed by sociologists. Which of following is (are) correct outcomes of this mapping process? a. the structural-functional approach maps onto macroextremism b. Durkheim's sociological theory maps onto macroextremism c. symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology map onto macroextremism d. a and b e. all of the above

The structural-functional approach and Durkheim's sociological theory, both being related to macro-extremism, accurately map onto theorizing the individual-society relationship. However, symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, focusing on micro-level analysis, don't map onto macro-extremism.

Explanation:

To map classical and modern sociological theories onto individual-society relationships, it's important to understand the distinct perspectives these theories offer. The structural-functional approach, rooted in the works of Émile Durkheim, is indeed aligned with macro-level analysis, giving credence to option a and b of your question. This functionalist view emphasizes how each part of society serves a role in maintaining societal stability.

However, theories like symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology are grounded in the micro-level analysis of societal interactions, focusing more on how individuals shape and interpret their social world through symbols and interactions. Thus, these theories wouldn't map onto the macro-extremism perspective.

In conclusion, options a and b are the accurate outcomes when mapping classical and modern sociological theories onto theorizing the individual-society relationship.

Learn more about Map of Classical and Modern Sociological Theories here:

https://brainly.com/question/28953343

#SPJ11