Answer :
Thee events in this timeline reflect the incorporation of Amendments into the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, options A and B are correct.
What is the Bill of Rights?
The cases Gitlow v. New York (1925), Mapp v. Ohio (1961), and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) are all related to the Bill of Rights. The events of this timeline reflect the process of incorporating the first, fourth, and sixth amendments to the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, options A and B are correct because they both point to the same events, such as amendments and the Supreme Court's incorporation of the Bill of Rights on a case-by-case basis.
Learn more about the Bill of Rights, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8008968
#SPJ1
Your question seems incomplete, but most probabkly, the question was:
Multiple choices are:
- Cases that led to the incorporation of new amendments into the Constitution
- The Supreme Court's incorporation of the Bill of Rights on a case- by-case basis
- The increasing pressure on the Supreme Court to regulate citizens'behaviour
- Challenges to the process of incorporating the Bill of Rights
The timeline reflects the Supreme Court's use of the 14th Amendment's process of incorporation, expanding Bill of Rights protections to the states through landmark decisions like Gitlow v. New York, Mapp v. Ohio, and Gideon v. Wainwright.
The events listed in the timeline are reflective of the process of incorporation, whereby the United States Supreme Court has interpreted the 14th Amendment to apply the Bill of Rights to the states. In Gitlow v. New York (1925), the Court began to nationalize the Bill of Rights by applying the First Amendment's free speech protection to the states. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) furthered this process by incorporating the Fourth Amendment's protection against illegal searches and seizures, requiring states to exclude evidence obtained in violation of this principle. The Gideon v. Wainwright case (1963) expanded the rights of the accused by ensuring the right to free legal representation for those who cannot afford an attorney, thereby applying the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel to state-level prosecutions.
