Final answer:
Pete's mistake in his conclusion is that he stated the quadrilaterals were congruent when he used a sequence of transformations that included a dilation. Dilation changes the size of the figure while maintaining shape, thus the shapes are similar but not congruent.
Explanation:
In his conclusion, Pete made an error by stating that the quadrilaterals A, B, C, D, and E, F, G, H are congruent because he used a sequence of rigid transformations. However, transformations that include a dilation are not rigid transformations. Rigid transformations, such as rotations, reflections, or translations, preserve the shape and size of the figure, making the resulting figure congruent to the original. A dilation, however, changes the size of the figure while maintaining its shape, resulting in a figure similar to, but not congruent with, the original. Therefore, although Pete was able to map quadrilateral A, B, C, D onto E, F, G, H, the two shapes are not congruent because dilation was a part of the sequence of transformations he used.
Learn more about Rigid transformations here:
https://brainly.com/question/31757509
#SPJ3