Answer :
Let's break down the problem step by step:
1. First Expression:
- We have [tex]\(01 + 4(4) + 93\)[/tex].
- Start with [tex]\(1 + 4 \times 4 + 93\)[/tex].
- Calculate [tex]\(4 \times 4 = 16\)[/tex].
- Add the results: [tex]\(1 + 16 + 93 = 110\)[/tex].
2. Second Expression:
- We see [tex]\(0 + \varphi = 39\)[/tex]. However, since [tex]\(\varphi\)[/tex] (phi) is not defined in this context, it does not affect our specific calculation here and is unrelated to our operation.
3. Final Part of the Equation:
- We have [tex]\(x_5 + 0 + 0 + 0 = ?\)[/tex].
- From the context, we understand [tex]\(x_5\)[/tex] needs to be the result of the previous calculations.
Therefore, [tex]\(x_5\)[/tex] equals the result of the first expression, which is [tex]\(110\)[/tex].
So, both [tex]\(110\)[/tex] is the final answer for [tex]\(01 + 4(4) + 93\)[/tex], and [tex]\(x_5\)[/tex] equals [tex]\(110\)[/tex].
1. First Expression:
- We have [tex]\(01 + 4(4) + 93\)[/tex].
- Start with [tex]\(1 + 4 \times 4 + 93\)[/tex].
- Calculate [tex]\(4 \times 4 = 16\)[/tex].
- Add the results: [tex]\(1 + 16 + 93 = 110\)[/tex].
2. Second Expression:
- We see [tex]\(0 + \varphi = 39\)[/tex]. However, since [tex]\(\varphi\)[/tex] (phi) is not defined in this context, it does not affect our specific calculation here and is unrelated to our operation.
3. Final Part of the Equation:
- We have [tex]\(x_5 + 0 + 0 + 0 = ?\)[/tex].
- From the context, we understand [tex]\(x_5\)[/tex] needs to be the result of the previous calculations.
Therefore, [tex]\(x_5\)[/tex] equals the result of the first expression, which is [tex]\(110\)[/tex].
So, both [tex]\(110\)[/tex] is the final answer for [tex]\(01 + 4(4) + 93\)[/tex], and [tex]\(x_5\)[/tex] equals [tex]\(110\)[/tex].
