Answer :
AI has both beneficial and negative effects on writing abilities; it offers valuable feedback and editing assistance but raises concerns about academic integrity and the authenticity of student work. Human feedback is crucial as AI cannot replicate the nuanced human experience in writing.
The question pertains to the beneficial or negative effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on writing abilities. The emergence of AI technologies like ChatGPT in scholarly publishing and writing is a double-edged sword. On one hand, AI writing assistants can provide valuable feedback and can help generate ideas or edit textual content quickly, potentially empowering writers by allowing them to clarify their own purpose and critique plausible-sounding AI suggestions.
However, there are notable concerns. AI output may be indistinguishable from human writing, which poses challenges for academic integrity and the authenticity of student work. The ease with which AI can generate essays and articles could devalue the learning process associated with writing and necessitate new measures to monitor and assess student work.
It is important to remember that AI feedback should complement human feedback, not replace it. AI does not have the human experience and may miss nuances in language and expression that are important for truly effective communication. While these tools can be useful, human engagement and feedback remain crucial for meaningful breakthroughs in the writing process.
